Resurrection morning is the diadem of a Triune covenant, formed in eternity past, for a lost and sinful people.

First, the Father is set before us as the One who raised the Son. Peter says plainly: “The God of our fathers raised up Jesus” (Acts 5:30). That gives resurrection morning a deep and strong beauty, does it not? The Father who sent the Son, sustained the Son, and laid upon Him the guilt of His people, now openly vindicates Him. The resurrection is the Father’s personal declaration that the Son’s sacrifice has been received, the debt fully answered, the obedience of the Surety accepted, and death itself overcome. The Father speaks in the empty tomb.

Yet the Son also has power over His own resurrection. He declares in John 10:17–18, “I lay down my life, that I might take it again... I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again.” Christ entered death willingly, as the obedient Mediator and faithful Substitute. He rose in the power of His own divine person. The Prince of life entered death, conquered it, and left its garments behind Him. The Son speaks in the empty tomb.

And the Holy Spirit is joined to that power as well: “But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you” (Romans 8:11). The Spirit, who moved upon the face of the waters at creation, is performing His mightier act at the dawn of the new creation. The risen body of Christ is the firstfruits of that coming world. The Spirit speaks in and through the empty tomb.

So, resurrection morning is a Triune morning. Each Person, equal in substance, glory, will, and power, is joined in this singular mighty act. The Father raised Him. The Son took up His life again. The Holy Spirit quickened His holy humanity. Two thousand years ago, the Father declared, the Son triumphed, and the Spirit gave life.

What firmer ground could be given to our feeble faith? The whole Godhead stands beside the risen Christ, so that our souls may rest here with full assurance. Jesus lives by the glory of the Triune God, and because He lives, His people shall live also.

Subscribe now

The seven words of Christ from the cross are amazing. Seven speaks of fullness. Yet the greater wonder is what flows from Him in the height of His suffering. The cross presses Him, and what comes forth reveals so much.

He is crucified, and He prays. “Father, forgive them.” The first sound from the cross is intercession. Even while men are driving the nails, the great High Priest is already pleading.

He is in agony, yet He saves. “To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.” With one word, He opens heaven to a dying thief. The Man nailed in weakness still has the keys of paradise. A cross will not dethrone Him.

He’s bearing the sins of the bride, yet He does not forget His mother. “Woman, behold thy son.” In the midst of redemptive suffering, He honors the fifth commandment and provides for His mother.

He enters the deepest darkness and cries, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” This is the abyss. Here, He stands where guilty sinners should stand. He does not cease to call Him “my God,” even when He is forsaken. Faith holds while comfort is withdrawn.

He fulfills Scripture in the smallest detail (Ps. 69). “I thirst.” It is a simple word, but it shows the reality of His humanity and the precision of God’s counsel. The Redeemer does not seem to suffer. He truly suffers.

He declares victory before He dies. “It is finished.” The work given Him by the Father is complete. The sacrifice is accomplished. The debt is paid. The types are fulfilled. Hell has not conquered Him. He has finished the work.

Then He dies as Victor. “Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit.” He yields up His life consciously, willingly, trustingly. Death does not seize Him as prey. He lays down His life.

So what is so amazing about the seven sayings?

Amazingly, every word is full of majesty and meekness together. He is priest, king, son, substitute, shepherd, and conqueror together. He is bleeding and blessing. Dying, yet saving. Forsaken, yet trusting. Parched, yet finishing, surrendering His spirit, yet ruling the moment of His own death.

Then the sayings move in holy steps. He speaks to men, to the thief, to His mother, to God, to His own bodily need, to the accomplishment of redemption, and finally back to His Father. The whole cross becomes a window into His heart. Nothing disordered appears. No condeming word escapes Him. No murmur rises. No panic rules Him. The Lamb is spotless even on the altar.

And perhaps most amazing of all, these sayings show that the cross outstretches something done to Jesus, to something Jesus is doing. He’s actively obeying, fulfilling, bearing, loving, finishing, and entrusting Himself to the Father. Even on a cursed tree, He is the obedient second Adam.

That is why the seven sayings are amazing. They are the last jewels from the lips of the dying Redeemer. In them, you hear the heart of the gospel itself, mercy for sinners,

pradise opened,

family loved,

wrath endured,

scripture fulfilled,

Redemption accomplished,

And the Son returning to His Father, and our Father.

You thought I was about to give you some thoughts on passive income and the Christian. Or perhaps on the believer and the side hustle. That wouldn’t be a bad idea, actually. Income in the future will probably look a lot different than the past.

But no. You have been tricked.

With no further ado, let me introduce you to something far more disruptive.

                                   Creating Passive Income in Heaven, or
                                    Invest in your forever life (here on earth).

Let’s look at the text, and see if my title has merit.

“Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also” (Matthew 6:19–21).

Why did Jesus say this? Why did He say these exact words?

Because He was preaching to men. Men who worried about food every day, clothing, station, some kind of security. Men who knew exactly how prevalent it was for thieves to take your things.

He chooses moth.
He chooses rust.
He chooses thieves.

All three are corrupters, destroyers.

In no way is Jesus saying that earthly treasure is immoral. Look closely. He argues that it is extremely vulnerable. He exposes its slow decay and vanishment (moth). He points out the corrosion of all things earthly (rust). He exposes the theft of time and talent, people robbing your treasure, or robbing you of the best years of your life. Everything you store up here has an expiration date; threescore and ten, maybe twenty.

But, “Lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven.”

I remember a woman in my second congregation who said that this verse upset her. She said, “We should never be so selfish as to do good for a future reward. We should just do it.” I do not think she is far off in sensing the danger of mercenary motives. Yet still, Jesus did say it.

I do not believe this is metaphor. It is imperative language in the Greek, so it presumes a real connection between this life and the next. What the believer does here in faith, enabled by the indwelling Spirit, accrues treasures in heaven (not as wages by our merit), but as gracious fruits accepted in the Beloved. God is pleased, out of His mere grace, to reward these works (Westminster Larger Catechism 193), crowning what He Himself has wrought in us through union with Christ.

The implication is staggering.

Your earthly life is short. Some call it a waiting room for glory. I rather think it is an time of enterprise for our forever home. There will come a time when this “inch” we call earthly life (Rutherford) will be but the faintest of our faint memories.

Our Lord is telling us this life is gospel-fruit accumulation that, somehow, gives the child of God treasure in heaven. This life is the believer’s greatest investment opportunity.

I am not speaking about the health-and-wealth prosperity heresy. It is more like upper-east-side living in the New Jerusalem. Because you will have to die to spend it. “As one star differeth from another star in glory. So also is the resurrection of the dead” (1 Corinthians 15:41–42).

He then gives the governing principle:

“For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.”

Your heart follows your investment. I know this by experience.

If my capital is buried in reputation, my heart will quake at criticism.
If my capital is buried in retirement, my heart will tremble with the market.
If my capital is buried in comfort, my heart will panic at inconvenience.

But if my treasure is in heaven, my heart begins to detach from the volatility of this market. We hold onto it with a loose grip, because we are holding fast to Christ’s promise, “I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also” (John 14:2–3).

Do we ever look at good works as future treasure? Do we ever consider that manifesting the Spirit-wrought fruit of the Spirit will actually be tasted in heaven?

Mostly, we look at good works as merit for acceptance. But that is not right. We are not saved by works, for then faith is no longer faith.

If Perkins has taught me anything, the unconverted man can do good things, but they always proceed from a polluted fountain. But the believer, doing the same things, indwelt by the Holy Spirit, offers what pleases God. These acts, done in faith and supremely for love of Christ, become deposits that God graciously rewards in the next life. Not to earn acceptance (which is ours solely in Christ), but to enlarge our capacity for eternal delight in Him. The reward is deeper communion, greater measures of glory commensurate with faithfulness, all without envy in the presence of the Lamb.

What does this mean for the Christian in the modern world?

It means you measure success differently.

Today, the world runs on visibility. Followers. Scale. Output. Personal brand. Optimization. Efficiency.

The hidden life does not trend.

But heaven’s economy runs on treasure acquired on earth.

Take the fruit of the Spirit for instance.

Love that actually costs you something.
Joy that persists in affliction.
Peace that steadies a home with the gospel.
Longsuffering in a marriage that stretches you.
Gentleness in a conversation where you could easily dominate.
Goodness when no one is watching.
Faith in an unseen Christ.
Meekness under provocation.
Temperance when no one is around.

Each act of Spirit-wrought obedience is a deposit in heaven’s treasury.

You forgive when you could retaliate.
You give when you could hoard.
You pray when you could scroll.
You remain faithful in obscurity.

These all compound eternally, not through any mechanical interest of our own, but through the multiplying grace of God who rewards grace for grace.

This is passive income in heaven.

The upfront investment is costly, though the account is totally free. I fear my account too empty, too sparse. Because the investment, I have found, costs the flesh dearly. But there is much mortification to gain, and no time to lose. Jesus says the yield manifests long after the moment has passed.

You will probably never see any returns here. This life is a vale of tears. That’s precisely Jesus’ point. The return is stored away in glory, where nothing can touch it. Safe in the Person and work of Christ.

You cannot generate this passive income on your own, you must collaborate.

Christ Himself is the treasury. He is the inheritance. All heavenly investment flows from union with Him. Without Him, we are all spiritually bankrupt. In Him, even little things done in faith become a deposit.

A word of advice: do not tell people about it! Do not Instagram, or Facebook, or X your good works for all to see. Jesus spoke of those that did: “Verily I say unto you, They have their reward” (Matthew 6:2).

Post it on X, poof, it is gone.
Tell it to your friends, ever so humbly, poof, gone.

Do not broadcast your mercy.
Do not curate your generosity.
Do not leak your obedience by carefully measured humility.
Poof, poof, poof.
Do so, and heaven marks it paid.

But if you do good where no one can repay you,
if you love where there is no return,
if you give where no applause follows, flowing from your love to Christ,
then the treasure grows.

And Christ says the recompense waits “at the resurrection of the just” (Luke 14:14).

There are only two moments you can be paid.

Now.
Or then.

Believer, choose carefully.

Subscribe now

We are invited here into a walled, hidden, secret, wonderfully fragrant garden. Unknown until this moment. A place protected from the outside, tended in silence, kept from the stranger’s foot. This garden is the believing church through all time, and the hidden life of the soul of the bride. Planted in secret, it is watered by faith and grace, growing with soul-spices rare and costly: myrrh of surrender, frankincense of worship, cinnamon of love, calamus of uprightness, saffron of joy in suffering, aloes of patient longing.

These are deep-rooted, slow-ripening treasures. Their perfume does not release easily. It is drawn out only when the air moves with power. When pressure passes over and wind touches leaf, blossom, fruit, bark, and soil.

Earlier in the chapter, the Bridegroom Himself says:

“A garden enclosed is my sister, my spouse.”
(Song of Solomon 4:12)

A garden is enclosed.
Owned.
Planted by Another.

This prayer flows from belonging and longing. It is spoken by the bride, the Lamb’s wife. (Rev. 21:9).

It is her prayer, awakened by love, inviting the full work of God the Spirit within.

She does not ask for one wind. She asks for two.

“Awake, O north wind; and come, thou south.”

No garden chooses its winds. It only receives them.

In Scripture, the north wind is sharp and biting. It carries cold across the life. It stiffens the body. It tightens providence. It makes the leaves of the soul tremble and the branches bow. It clears what is of no value, revealing what is shallow in root. It cuts through comfort and leaves no sinful thing standing. It is bracing, severe, cleansing.

Job knew this wind and confessed it:

“Out of the north cometh cold: and God is great, and we know him not.”
(Job 37:22)

This is a dangerous prayer to pray lightly: “Awake, O north wind.” For the north wind strips. It blasts away coverings we have grown accustomed to wearing. It dries dead surface pools. It bites at what is carnal. It shakes the branches of the soul until what has no good root loosens and falls from the vine.

Our Lord Himself prepares us for this wind:

“These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.”
(John 16:33)

This tribulation is outward. But it also enters the inner life. It presses upon the conscience. It exposes divided affections. It makes us feel the great conflict of conversion:

“For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other.”
(Galatians 5:17)

All inward warfare, as well as outward, all testing and temptations, losses and trials, is north wind.

Yet the bride also prays, “Come, thou south.”

The south wind comes from the opposite direction with an opposite work. It is heavy with warmth. It opens the clenched heart. It moves gently through the understanding, the conscience, the will, and the affections. It carries dew to thirsty ground. It loosens fragrance from both petal and bark with rays of love. It restores, warms, softens, and heals what has been made tender by pruning, digging, and dunging. It binds up the brokenhearted and settles what has been shaken. All to ripen for eternity.

Notice, the bride calls for both. She has learned by experience that love for Christ must not be selective. As grace matures in its first work, the soul no longer bargains about how holiness will be formed, because both winds come from the same Breather. The Spirit does not wound apart from love, nor does He comfort apart from justice. He strips to heal. He chills to mortify. He warms in order to ripen.

She asks them both to blow in their turn.

Why?

“That the spices thereof may flow out.”

Spices do not release fragrance in stillness. To be known requires motion, contact, air moving across them. Many of the sweetest graces in the Christian life would never ripen without frost, nor sweeten without the sun. Perfumes of humility, patience, repentance, tenderness toward others, would never be released without wind.

Now listen to the heart of the prayer:

“Let my beloved come into his garden, and eat his pleasant fruits.”

This marks a distinct change in her posture. Earlier in the Song, the bride cried:

“The king hath brought me into his chambers.”
(Song of Solomon 1:4)

Here she invites Him. Her love has matured. Her experience has deepened.

She calls the garden, the fruits, whatever grace has grown, His. She invites Him to come, to enjoy and take delight. This is the inward miracle of the Spirit’s work, when the soul invites Christ to sample His own work.

What a gently searching passage.

Do we only pray for the south winds?

This verse teaches us how to pray. Not, “Lord, keep me in warm, temperate climes,” but, “Blow. Do what is necessary for me, in me. Stir my sleeping. Uncover what is hidden. And above all, come Thyself.” Communion with Christ is the goal of every providence that blows through the believer’s life.

A fitting prayer for us tonight is this:

Lord, we are Thy garden. Send whatever winds Thou wilt. Only do not pass us by. Come into Thy garden, this congregation, and into the believing heart, and take delight in the works of Thine own never-forsaking hands. Amen.

Subscribe now

That’s a deep question many believers have asked.

The short answer is this. Scripture doesn’t call us to spend much time tracing the source of a sinful thought so much as judging its nature, and responding accordingly. The Word of God gives us some light to speak carefully about the difference. So here it is in shorthand.

First, Scripture teaches that sinful thoughts arise from our fallen human nature. James says, “Every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed” (James 1:14). The heart, even in the regenerate, still contains remaining corruption (Romans 7). Old sinful habits, memories, desires, and reflexes of the flesh surface without warning. The suddenness of a thought does not prove it is satanic, though it may be. The heart is a deep, dark labyrinth. Indwelling sin lurks in the shadows of the light, waiting for the right moment to attempt control.

Scripture also teaches that Satan actually does tempt, suggest, and provoke (Matthew 4:1–3; Luke 22:31; John 13:2). But he is not omniscient. He is not omnipresent. We need to understand that. He is called the tempter, yet he can’t possibly tempt every tempted person. Most are largely left alone because they are already his (John 8:44). Unless, of course, he is enlisting them in his war. Redeemed sinners on the other hand, will at times, face personal attacks from Satan’s daemons. His tactics are well known.

He casts fiery darts (Eph.6:16). He draws the heart away (James 1:14; 2 Cor. 11:3). He sifts as wheat (Luke 22:31). He accuses the brethren (Rev. 12:10; Zech.3:1). He disguises himself as an angel of light (2 Cor. 11:14) He seeks advantage through ignorance (2 Cor. 2:11). He snatches away the Word (Matt. 13:19). As the second greatest anthropologist in history, he has done his homework. He knows our weaknesses. So yes, the devil/s often works by way of thoughts that are foreign to new life, intrusive, blasphemous, even violent in their suggestion, especially when they happen during prayer or moments of spiritual seriousness. Yet the devil can’t sin for you. Your flesh is the dry tinder. Your lust is the gas. The devil presents the spark. There would be no fire if there were nothing to burn. He doesn’t create new material. He works with existing flesh.

So how do I know if sinful thoughts are from me, or from the devil?

The most important thing isn’t where the thought came from, but how you respond to it. When a thought enters, there is an incredibly brief moment where we either consent or resist. Is it welcomed, invited in, entertained? Is it embraced like an old lost friend? Then why does origin matter? It doesn’t. To be honest, if hell’s minions never visited me again, I would have all the tinder and gas I need to destroy myself. But on the other hand, a wicked thought that is resisted, fought against and wrestled into the light of the Son, is resisting sin. Regardless where it came from. Luther’s old line is so memorable, You cannot stop birds from flying over your head, but you can stop them from building a nest in your hair.

I would also add that your conscience gives an important clue. When a sinful thought arises, does your soul recoil? That response itself is telling. The unregenerate may grieve the effects and consequences of sin, but only the child of God grieve sin as sin. Especially in the face of so loving a Savior. Even then the believer may be horrified by thoughts he never chose and never wanted. That horror is the proof of grace (Romans 7:22,23).

Beware of over-scrupulosity. What I mean is don’t become trapped in constant inward looking, asking unbearably deep questions to yourself. This usually leads to paralysis of soul and unrelenting despair. Think of the man in the iron cage in Pilgrim’s Progress. Scripture does not teach an inward spiral. It calls us to watch, pray (as we heard last Lord’s Day), resist, flee, and fix our eyes on Christ. Whether the thought came from outside or inside makes no lasting difference. The remedy is the same. Humbled by sin, we are called to “Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you” (James 4:7). How do we resist? Through confessed need. Through faith. Through fresh dependence on the Spirit of Christ.

2 Corinthians 10:4, 5 
“For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds; Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ.”

Finally, I hope you will remember this. Christ “was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15). Temptation itself is not sin. Understand that clearly. When sin presents itself, it is not the first thought that matters most, it’s the second. Many of the most distressing thoughts believers experience are exactly the ones they hate and love the most according to Paul (Romans 7:15-24). “On second thought” should be our reply to temptation.

And one last thing, if the devil can’t win you to sin by temptation, he will accuse you for being tempted in the first place, turning warfare itself into false guilt. It is a merciless tactic.

So ask fewer questions about origin, and more questions about response.

Did I consent to this thought?

Did I welcome it?

Did I fight it?

Did I bring it to Christ?

And when the cry is as short and sweet as, “Help, Lord!” you may rest assured that grace was already working.

Subscribe now

If I had to name one, and only one, it would be a deep, personal sense that God is real, holy, and near, and that we all live life before His face.

The rising generation doesn’t suffer from a lack of information. They are over-saturated with words, images, arguments, and explanations. What they lack is depth, gravity. Very little in their world presses on the soul with permanence. Everything is selectable, editable, scrollable, reversible. Identity itself is treated as something you can try on or take off. In that atmosphere, God becomes easily sidelined, abstracted, recognized, but not reckoned with in the soul.

They need to know, in the marrow, that the living God addresses them in the Covenant of Grace. That He sees. That He speaks. That He commands. That He invites. That He forgives. That He will judge the world in righteousness. Without that, the bible becomes trivia, doctrine becomes a burden, worship becomes atmosphere, and morality becomes pliable.

This is why biblical, reverent worship matters so much. Why preaching must carry scriptural authority, without pretended-performance. It’s why fathers and mothers walking humbly with God in the home, preaches more loudly than a thousand youth programs. Why the ordinary means of grace, regularly administered and attended, are more precious than religious baubles and bubbles, (to quote Thomas Brooks). Most importantly, the rising generation learns what is real, by what their parents today, treat as real. And they are watching us.

When a child grows up in a church where sin is called sin, where grace is offered without cheapness, and where the Word of God is spoken with fear and tenderness, something is pressed into his deepest and most pliable parts. He may wander. He may resist for a season. Yet he does not easily escape the sense that there is a God with whom he has to do. I find this most true, about the time they get married and have children.

In short, the rising generation does not most need relevance, or invention, or protection from the hard edges of the faith. What they need is the fear of the Lord, and believe the glorious gospel of Jesus Christ in an awakened, personal way. Everything else that will last through to the rising generation, will grow from that soil.

Subscribe now

If you have a question, you can email me. If I think the question is practical and helpful, I will post it here.

There are places in Scripture where the Lord teaches by contrast. By stripping away what we assume must be present for Him to speak.

Elijah at Horeb is one of those moments.

Elijah has just come victoriously from Mount Carmel (1 Kings 18:19-40). An all consuming fire has fallen from heaven (18:38). The prophets of Baal have been exposed and destroyed (18:40). The power of the Lord has been both public and profound (18:36-39).

If ever there were a moment when a servant of God might expect clarity, assurance, and above all, peace, it would be now.

Instead, Elijah collapses inwardly (v.3).

He is exhausted.
He hides because he’s scared.

He tells the Lord that he is finished (19:4) because he is alone (19:10).

He had spoken for LORD of Hosts, but now he desires to be spoken to.

And we know that the voice of God comes to Elijah, after the height of his courage.

At the end of it, in fact.

The voice came when Elijah felt threadbare, sitting alone in a cave (19:9).

The Lord brought Elijah to Horeb, the mount of God, of all places. It’s also known as Sinai. This is the mountain of God’s greatest revelation to date, His Law. And guess what accompanied that revelation? Thunder, fire, and earthquake announced the nearness of God (Ex. 19:16–18).

Elijah knows it.
He knows what this place is, and what happened there of old.

And then “the LORD”, it says, “passes by” (v.11).

In that passing by, there is a great and strong wind (v.11), so powerful that it breaks rocks in pieces. But the LORD is not in the wind. There is an earthquake (v.11), but the LORD is not in the earthquake. There is fire, but the LORD is not in the fire (v.12).

God has used all of these elements before to His glory.

But here, deliberately, He withholds Himself from each one of them.

And then comes what the text calls “a still small voice,” literally a gentle whisper, a quiet breath.

Before we get to that blessed section, what’s striking is the flurry of where the LORD was not.

The LORD is teaching his servant. He is instructing his heart that nearness is not bound to the phenomenal.

The Sinai-shaking God also speaks softly.
The God of fire from heaven is also the God of gentle breathings.

That is helpful for us, is it not?

Many of us live with a quiet belief that messages from God come wrapped in power. That assurance comes from the magnitude of the visit. That if God is truly at work, He must reveal Himself unmistakably, overwhelmingly, and undeniably so.

This passage teaches otherwise.

More often than not, dear ones, the deepest words of God speaks are simple, soft, quiet, faithful.

Let’s be careful here.

The still small voice of the Spirit is not some inner prompting floating freely. We are not gnostics in this church. But it is God dealing personally, deeply, scripturally, and unimpressively with a weary servant.

What is Elijah given? He is given new direction, a little correction, and much reassurance in his present distress.

And that is where the passage becomes especially applicable for us.

Because the temptation will be to think that this is a secret invitation to mysticism, or as permission to chase after feelings and private revelations. No. That has gotten people into much trouble. Many cults and cultic tendencies have come by way of “God spoke to me”.

Instead, it teaches us how God ordinarily applies His truth to the soul.

Quietly.
Patiently.
Personally.

In ways He Himself appoints.

In Elijah’s case, the Lord speaks directly, because Elijah is a prophet in a revelatory office. That office is no longer extant today.

Today, the Lord speaks (no less truly) through the ways He has appointed in His Word, the means of grace.

Through the Word read and preached (Rom. 10:17).
Through the sacraments administered (Matt. 28:19; 1 Cor. 11:23–26).
Through prayer offered in faith, both privately and corporately (Acts 2:42).
Through the communion of the saints (Heb. 10:24–25).

This is where the passage becomes especially important to the believing heart.

Many of us know what it is to live in the wind and the earthquake. The tumult of family concerns. The pressure of work. The sorrow of illness. The confusion of unanswered questions. The sense of spiritual dryness.

He sends them all.

We expect that if He sends them, He will speak in them.

Dear one, sometimes the LORD does speak in the storm.
Sometimes He speaks after it.

What does that look like, when He speaks after?

It often comes, I have found, in a single truth coming to my heart with unusual clarity. A Psalm long known, made freshly known to my soul. A text that speaks in the hour of my need. A simple confession that Christ is enough, even here. Even now (2 Cor. 12:9).

And very often, I have come to see, that His still small voice is heard most clearly when we place ourselves deliberately under the regular means of grace.

There is a reason the Lord gathers His people together. There is a reason He calls us to sit under preaching, to pray together, to come to His table, to remember our baptism.

These are the appointed ways by which God corrects, comforts, heals, and restores the soul. They are the ordinary ways through which extraordinary grace flows.

Take the Lord’s Supper, for example.

There is nothing outwardly profound about it. Bread is broken. Wine is poured out. Words are spoken that we have heard many times.

Yet in that moment, as we partake by faith, Christ softly speaks peace to His people.

He assures me that His body was given for me, His blood shed for the complete remission of all my sins.

He steadies my heart in His Supper.
He strengthens trembling faith.
He wraps His comfort around the wounded conscience (1 Cor. 11:24–26).

The same is true of baptism.

The promise does not strike, but falls gentle.

Like rain upon the foreheads of our children, the still small voice of God says,

“I will be thy God” (Gen. 17:7).

A promise to be remembered, pleaded, and answered in due time. A still small voice that may carry across years, even decades, until the Lord applies it savingly to the heart.

And the same is true tonight.

When we gather for a Wednesday prayer meeting, we place ourselves where the Spirit of Christ has promised to be.

In the midst of us (Matt. 18:20).

We quiet ourselves under His Word.
We confess our sin, and need, and dependence.

We are acknowledging that we do not live by special revelations, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God (Matt. 4:4).

For some, the still small voice tonight may simply be:

“Fear not, thou worm Jacob… I will help thee, saith the LORD, and thy redeemer, the Holy One of Israel.”

To another it might be:

“I have not forgotten thee” (Isa. 49:15).

For another:

“My grace is sufficient for thee” (2 Cor. 12:9).

For others still:

“This way, walk ye in it” (Isa. 30:21).

Elijah quietly wraps his face in his mantle when he hears the Spirit’s voice. He recognizes the holy surprise of the moment. The LORD is near to restore him.

That is the quiet work the Spirit delights to do.

May we never despise stillness, or smallness, or assume that He is absent because He is gentle.

The Lord who speaks in the still small voice is the same Lord who commands the wind, earthquake, and fire. And He knows exactly how to speak to each of His people, in exactly the way they need.

Subscribe now

The simple application of this verse is this:

Being anxious for nothing by praying through everything.

Paul knows the anxious heart. In the believer, anxiety is a soulish symptom. It tells me that the weight of my trust has shifted. from God’s almightiness to my fleshly strength. From holy grounding, to unholy spiraling. When anxiety rises in my life, something has shifted from God’s power to mine. My soul now carries what it was never built to.

Anxiety is the mind rehearsing a future without God. Prayer becomes my soul’s conscious returning to the future’s Keeper. My flesh imagines outcomes. My spirit entrusts them to God.

Notice Paul’s totality. In every thing. There is no category too small, or ordinary, no fear too repetitive. The anxious heart often disqualifies itself to both faith and prayer by worry. I worry before prayer. I think I hear God saying, This is too petty. This again?! And I tell myself, I should be over this by now. But the Spirit through the pen of Paul says something quite different: If it troubles you, it belongs to Me. If it presses on your mind, it is already in My hand.

“Prayer, supplication, thanksgiving.” These three:

Prayer is the act of turning my cares Christ-ward.

Supplication is giving my need a voice.

Thanksgiving is the anchor that keeps prayer from shipwrecking against the rocks of despair.

All three tell my soul that the God who hears has already acted, already provided, already been faithful. It steadies my soul by firmly rooting my need into the soil of the character and promises of Christ.

For me, anxiety tends to be circular. It goes over the same ground again and again, never arriving. Prayer interrupts the cycle. Taking my cares to Christ is a linear line of direction. It moves outward from my soul, then upward to the Throne of Grace, away from the closed loop of my own mind. It interrupts anxiety’s endless rehearsal with a real audience, a living God, a listening Father.

What if I didn’t bring God to my anxiety, and stay where I am, in the swirl, in the tightening chest, my mind is spinning, inserting a thought about God into it. Almost like sprinkling holy water on a storm, and instead brought my anxieties to Christ my Mediator and Intercessor. There is One who stands between God and me, who has already opened the way by blood.

Now, if only I could take my own advice.

Being “careful or anxious for nothing” is an open hand in prayer. “Let your requests be made known unto God” is confessing my dependence. To speak my needs to God is to admit my weakness, confessing my creatureliness. I must not excuse my anxiety doing so. True prayer exposes my unbelief mixed with fear, or my fear mixed with unbelief. Gentle unbelief, perhaps, but unbelief nonetheless. Think of the father in Mark 9. “Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief.”

And then there is the beautiful promise that follows, “And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.” Instead of removing the question marks, peace turns them all into is the periods. It rests in loving Providences, both dark and light. Now peace stands watch over my concerns. Anxiety leaves the gates open. Prayer closes it, shutting my heart in with a merciful and sovereign God.

To be anxious for nothing is to fill my mouth with words to God. To pray through everything is to refuse to let a single fear seem too small, a single burden go unreleased. It is releasing what belongs to tomorrow, back into the Hands of Him who is the same yesterday, today, and forever.

The anxious man in me tries to see the whole path before I step. The peaceful man is asking for light, only upon the next step. The old man in me lives bent over the future. The praying man looks up to the Creator of heaven and earth, my Savior. And in looking, peace comes like a river.

Help LORD.

Subscribe now

The Fading of All Lesser Lights

The first sound of creation were four words “Let there be light” (Gen. 1:3). Before the sun or moon, light itself was called out of nothing, blazing at God’s command. Only later did He make lamps to hang it, the sun to rule the day and the moon to rule the night (Gen. 1:16). Since the dawn of time, every sunrise was a countdown to sunset. We never think of it as setting forever. But it will.

For six thousand years our sun has run its race, tirelessly (Ps. 19). Scientists tell us it will one day burn out, give or take a billion years. Scripture already said it would: “the fashion of this world passeth away” (1 Corinthians 7:31). One day, that earthly light will go out. There will be no more sun (Isaiah 60:19, 20). The rays that ripened our fields, the light that burst through our kitchen windows, the moon that lit our sleepless nights, they will be gone forever.

When John describes what lies beyond this world he surprisingly says, “The city had no need of the sun … for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.” The sun has always been a constant for us. But this passage now turns it into a 6000-year-old placeholder of the Glory of God, and light of the Lamb.

Humanly, we find it hard to make true sense of this verse. It sounds beautiful, but how to imagine it? How can the Glory of God and the Lamb light that city? Yet if we see with new eyes, part of it is not so hard to understand. But only in part (1 Cor. 13:9).

Tell me, what is light? Can you define it? Can you capture it? (lightning bugs excluded). Most of us have no idea what light actually is. We know it is photons with no mass, it has motion, and energy moving at a speed incomprehensible. It touches what it passes, yet remains untouched itself. It fills every space it enters, but has no mass or substance. That’s all we really know. Every created light, from the smallest spark to the gretest supernova, is simply borrowed from that first command. For the most part, light is a complete mystery to us. We simply take this miracle for granted. We should not. It is a gift the blind have never had.

The City

Before we get further into the light, let’s look at the city herself. Remember, John is trying to capture what he is seeing in the spirit (Rev. 1:10; 4:2), with his first century vocabulary, thousands of year in the future. We do not envy his task. When it came to describing what John was seeing, it was easier for him to use metaphor than describe the indescribable. How often he seems to pile up words, using “like”, and “as”, and “like unto.”

“His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire” (Rev. 1:14). None of that was what he actually saw. It was like it. “And his voice as the sound of many waters”, not actually many waters (1:15). “His countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength” (1:16), not the actual sun.

Imagine being a 1st Century writer transported to Times Square, at night. Then trying to write about it in the vocabulary of ancient Koine Greek. Thankfully, symbols, and likenesses, and comparisons, in descriptive language, remain timeless.

So what is this city?

The City is the New Jerusalem, the Bride herself adorned and made ready. John says, “Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife… and he showed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem” (Rev. 21:9–10). Heaven, in its final and fullest sense, is the King of that City and His perfected bride joined in everlasting union (Heb. 12:22,23).

The city’s measurements are equal in length, breadth, and height (Rev. 21:16). A perfect cube, matching the description of the Most Holy Place over which the Shekinah rested (1 Kings 6:20). That’s very interesting. In means the Holy of Holies is now the new creation. No corner is left outside the presence of God (Rev. 21:1).

Her foundations are precious stones, each gleaming with element light (Rev 21). Her walls are salvation itself, transparent yet impenetrable (Isa. 26:1). All gates are as pearls, open, never shut, because nothing unclean can enter (Rev. 21:21, 25, 27). Through the middle of this city runs the river of the water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding from the throne of God and of the Lamb (Rev 22). On either side grows the tree of life, whose leaves are for the healing of the nations (Rev. 22:2).

If you wanted to put it simply (and it can’t be simply put): the City is all creation finally become worship (Ps. 150:6; Rom. 8:21), and a glorified bride finally coming home (Rev. 19:7). It is the last garden and the First Church of Eternity, one and the same.

How Can This Be?

“Sun and moon,” “Glory of God” and “the Lamb.” These are four lights. Two created, two Uncreated. Interesting contrast. We could say, the prophetic lights and fulfillment Lights. Scripture says: “God is light, and in him is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5). That is a statement about God’s being. “No variance, no shadow of turning.” “The Father of lights.” (James 1:17) When John says, “the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof,” he is tracing the end of that prophetic arc. Rather than the “glory of God” being something external, it is His Selfsame-holiness and Selfsame-goodness, manifest. It is God’s self, His essence, now unveiled rather than veiled. To call Him “the Father of lights” is to recognize Him as the fountainhead of every kind of illumination, natural, moral, and spiritual. There is “no variableness, neither shadow of turning” in Him, because self-existent light does not shift. He has neither top nor bottom, beginning or end, front or back, up or down, or shadow or variance. God is light.

What is the Lamb, then? The Lamb is the personal embodiment of that glory (Col. 1:15), the visible face of invisible light (Heb. 1:3; 2 Cor. 4:6). As He shines, it is the eternal life of God made apparent (John 1:4). Creation’s twin lights taught dependence and time; redemption’s Lights reveal immediacy and permanence.

Subscribe now

So what is that actual luminescence in heaven to creatures with physical eyes? We can’t really say.

Except, the light of that city will not come out of thin air. It will be some kind of emitting of the Lamb “who is above all, and through all, and in you all” (Eph. 4:6). It will somehow be the very presence of God filling all things (Ephesians 1:23). When John says, “the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof,” he is describing something our fallen human minds cannot comprehend. In our world, light travels through space. In that world, it appears God is the space in which we “live, and move, and have our being” (Acts 17:28).

In the resurrection, the entire created order will be transfigured. Matter, either changed or permeated. Paul calls this “the glorious liberty of the children of God” (Romans 8:21). Creation will share in resurrection’s light! Every particle, every molecule will be transform to the will and beauty of its Maker (Hab. 2:14).

This all seems strange to us, I know. It was strange to the disciples too, when Jesus walked through doors (John 20:19, 26). Christ’s heaven-bound body after the resurrection gives us some clues. His body was physical, He ate, spoke, and could be touched (Luke 24:39–43), yet it shone with unborrowed life. What the disciples saw in flashes on the Mount of Transfiguration will become the common experience of all in heaven. “His face did shine as the sun, and His raiment was white as the light.” (Mat. 17:2). Then read this, He, “Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body”. We will be like Him in the resurrection. The Lamb’s humanity, perfectly united to Deity, becomes the lamp of all creation (Rev. 21:23; 22:5). Augustine in his City of God, (Book 22, Chapters 29, 30 but especially 30) opens this up most beautifully.

When Every Lesser Light Goes Out

One morning, we don’t know when, the final sunrise will come, and the final rays will follow. The glowing orb we have come to expect, will go out forever. Something more beautiful, far and exceedingly so, will light the whole city. Nothing opaque, nothing hidden, everything clear with holiness, every face bright by the brightness of the Mount of Transfiguration. There will be no daylight or nightlight in that city, just Light.

The redeemed will live in a transparency beyond imagination. Every heart open to God and to each other (1 John 3:2), every face bright with the radiance of the Lamb. What we now feel we taste in vanishing moments of communion here on earth, will somehow become the air we breathe. Love will no longer strive, or light endure, or diminish; it will just simply, be. All knowledge will be by holy discovery.

Such thoughts should make the believer homesick for a place he’s never been. We’ve lived all our lives by a borrowed, reflected and refracted light, looking through veils of weakness and half-understanding (2 Cor 3:18; 4:6). But one day, the believer will know, even as we are known. We will see Him for presently, we see through a glass darkly, but then face to face (1 Cor. 13:12). “Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is” (1 John 3:2).

Envy this most wondrous City, child of God. Never live content under this world’s borrowed light. We enter its gates on earth by the church Christ loves, His bride, and the means He has given for her salvation. If you don’t, the days of your life will sunset into an endless night, endless darkness, and the misery of an everlasting judgement (Jude 13; Mat. 25:30). The Light you ignore is already shining unto that perfect day, and is yet translating citizens from darkness to light (1 Pet. 2:9). And when the last sunset on earth falls, those who love the Lamb will awaken, and find all creation ablaze with God.

Subscribe now

The believer, unveiled by grace, comes a child welcomed home. He looks and lives. His faith is sight beginning. Every look at Christ refines the soul’s features, sanding down the hard lines that sin carved deep.

Beholding changes us. Not quickly, not painlessly, but surely. The old face fades. The new one, gentle, steadfast, forgiven, takes shape beneath the sight of glory. This is the secret of sanctification. We are transformed by worship, not will. The mirror of the Word, the preaching, the cup, the bread, all become one single lens through which the Spirit shows us Christ until the image is etched on our hearts.

The Lord’s Table ends, but the beholding does not need to. Communion begun in bread and wine, may continue on in regular life. I often see the believer leaving the Supper carrying light in the eyes, mercy on their lips, and peace across the countenance. Like Moses, others see it without knowing why, the quiet evidence of time spent before the face of God.

Heaven is never far to such a soul, if they would just pause an think of Him. The light that once seemed distant may grow day by day. Until that perfect Day. May we catch a vision of that Day, in the rehearsal dinner of the Lamb.

O Lord, keep me under that light until I wake and see Thee as Thou art. Then the mirror will be gone, but Thy likeness will remain forever.

Subscribe now

Every sin leaves a stain. Hasty words, undone duties, secret thoughts that rot in the corners of conscience. Water cannot reach them. Resolve’s solvent cannot lift them. Only one blood has power to cleanse what lies beneath the surface of the soul.

This world shrinks from blood, calls it barbaric. Yet heaven rejoices in it. Angels gaze with amazement upon redemption’s flow. Because this blood, spilled in rage, is poured out in love. It satisfies Divine justice while healing the wounded heart that caused it.

To drink from this cup is to confess, “My sin required this.”

It is also to believe, “This blood was shed for me.”

The two thoughts cannot be separated. Where confession deepens, assurance brightens.

The Supper as much about about beholding purification as it is remembering guilt. It is the taste of peace after long restlessness. The heart washed clean beats differently, slower, stronger, surer.

And when the last drop is taken, the believer is strengthened in forgiveness, that holy comfort, which becomes his constant desire. The conscience, once afraid to draw near, now draws near again and again. Perfect love has cast out fear.

O Christ, eternal Priest, keep me near this fountain.

Let no guilt grow old enough to harden.

Cleanse me daily, deeply, until even my memory wafts of mercy.

Your friend and pastor,

J. Lewis

Subscribe now

“And He took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is My body which is given for you” (Luke 22:19).

The breaking came before the giving. It always does. The bread was whole in His hands, then broken, then blessed, then given. So too, the heart that He calls His own. Jesus will never turn from the broken. He enters by brokenness. He gives thanks for what the world pities, and turns it into a vessel of beauty. The proud heart stays sealed and starved, but the contrite receive grace as daily bread.

At the Supper, the believer brings his own fractures. While others come to perform, the worthy communicant comes to remember. In his trembling hands is placed the proof of all that love has cost. The cup and the bread are the grammar of Calvary’s mercy, teaching us again what sin required and what Christ fulfilled.

“This is My body.” Every sin of the redeemed is pressed into that loaf, every obedience of Christ kneaded into His substance. When the bread is torn, the soul says “I am crucified with Christ”, the crust of pride giving way, the hardness of heart softening under the warmth of free, unmerited grace.

Breaking usually ends something. Here, His breaking brings newness of life. When the Lord wounds, He opens the way for His own healing. What He breaks, He blesses; what He breaks, He uses. And the more He is received, the more the heart learns what true wholeness is.

We come to the Table because He calls. And He calls those who need Him most. The unworthy find welcome, the weary find rest, the broken find bread. “He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away.” Luke 1:53

O Christ,

Thou who wast broken to make us whole,

take up the fragments of this life,

and use them for Thy praise.

Subscribe now

Nervous, we think He comes like a house inspector, but He comes as a Friend to help. He sits at the table of the heart, no longer knocking, but planning, doing. The believer feels the difference. There is a peaceableness now, a holy joy in the heart.

Dear ones, the Lord’s Supper is a Presence, receive it.

Sometimes in the stillness after the sermon, sometimes in the tears of a psalm, sometimes in a single blessing remembered in the Table call. The Spirit breathes his arrival in the bread and wine.

The Spirit teaches us new manners in this abode: to keep the rooms swept with repentance, to set the table daily with prayer, garnished with the fruit of the Spirit, listening for His voice moving from room to room.

The wonder is this: we, who would never go to Him, are met by Him who comes to us, and abides.

O Christ, make Thyself at home in this heart that so often wanders.
Let every thought be a lamp kept burning for Thee.

Subscribe now

We live in an age that never stops changing. But should that spirit of change find its way into Christ’s Church? Paul writes in 2 Thessalonians 2:15, “Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.” He said this because even in the earliest days there were those who wished to alter the order and customs of the Church. It has been so ever since. The duty of Christ’s Church is to keep those scriptural traditions handed down through the ages and not to yield them, however unfashionable they may appear.

One place where change has crept in is the Lord’s Supper. Over time, both the sacrament and the way we administer it have shifted. In many Reformed congregations, the people no longer come forward to a table. Instead, the bread and wine (or grape juice) are passed from pew to pew. From this practice of remaining seated came another change: the single communion cup was replaced by many small, individual cups, a distinctly American innovation. Only a few generations ago, such a thing was unheard of in our churches. Yet now, more and more congregations are setting aside the common cup for these individual ones.

Some may ask, “Does it really matter? Would the Lord concern Himself with something so small as the number of cups?” The answer of this brief study is clear: yes, it does matter to Him.

The Common Cup in Scripture

The first place we must look for understanding is the night of the Lord’s own institution. The Evangelist Luke records: “And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves.” (Luke 22:17). In that upper room, the Redeemer placed one cup into the hands of His disciples, not twelve, not several, but one. He blessed it, gave thanks, and commanded them to divide it (one content) among themselves. The act was both deliberate and instructive.

The Lord’s Supper was not an new creation, but the holy superseding fulfillment of the Passover feast. Mark and Paul both tell us that Christ instituted the Supper “after supper” (Mark 14:18; 1 Cor. 11:25). The Passover itself had long been marked by a shared cup; the rabbis speak of four ritual cups taken at different stages of the meal, but always in common. Our Lord took that familiar symbol and invested it with eternal meaning. He transformed the old covenant cup of hope into the new covenant cup of redemption. The form remained, one cup, shared among many, but the reality it pointed to was greater by far.

Thus, when the disciples received the cup from Christ’s hand, they did not each take a portion for themselves. They received what He gave, passed it to one another, and all drank of it. The unity of the vessel mirrored the unity of their salvation.

This is important to notice. It is a pattern repeated throughout the entire New Testament witness. In every passage where the Supper is mentioned, the Spirit speaks of the cup, always in the singular.

“And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it.” (Matt. 26:27)
“And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.” (Mark 14:23)
“Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.” (Luke 22:20)
“The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ?” (1 Cor. 10:16)
“After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.” (1 Cor. 11:25)

The same grammatical pattern holds without exception. The inspired writers use the definite article and the singular noun, to poterion, “the cup.” Nowhere in the New Testament do we read ta poteria, “the cups.” The Spirit’s precision is apparent. Scripture’s vocabulary is theology in miniature, and the unbroken use of the singular points us to divine intent: one Savior, one covenant, one blood shed for the remission of sins, and one cup representing that covenant in His Church.

This unity of expression carries a doctrinal weight. The Supper is a sacrament of communion, not of individuality. Its visible signs are meant to correspond to the invisible grace they signify. To multiply the cups is, even unintentionally, to obscure what Christ has made clear. The details of divine institution are never secondary. What God appoints, we do not alter; what Christ commands, we do not improve.

The command itself could hardly be plainer: “Take this, and divide it among yourselves.” (Luke 22:17). The demonstrative pronoun this directs our attention to the one container Christ held. The action He requires (divide it among yourselves) reveals both the manner and the meaning of the act. They were to partake of the same vessel and share together what came from His hand. Again, in Matthew 26:27, the Lord presses the same point: “Drink ye all of it.” The emphasis rests upon the singular it, one cup, one Christ, one covenant.

This uniformity of form and meaning carries through the apostolic teaching. When Paul writes to the Corinthians, he identifies the cup as the “communion of the blood of Christ” (1 Cor. 10:16). The term koinōnia means participation, fellowship, or shared life. The cup, then, is a reminder of Christ’s atonement, but it is also the visible symbol of shared redemption, the outward act that portrays inward union. To substitute a tray of individual cups for the single vessel is to turn the corporate fellowship of believers into a series of private gestures. It makes visible independence where Christ intended visible unity.

Some may argue that such distinctions are trivial, that what matters is the heart, not the form. But the Word of God does not treat His ordinances lightly. The Lord’s institutions are not human symbols; they are divine means of grace, and their form carries His message. To alter the sign is to obscure the thing signified. The church is not permitted to reimagine the symbols of grace according to convenience or preference.

Paul’s warning to the Colossians remains relevant: “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.” (Col. 2:8). The spirit of the age will always offer reasons to modify God’s order (whether for health, for expedience, or for comfort), but those reasons spring from the “rudiments of the world.” The Reformed conscience must answer differently. Our rule is the Word, not the wisdom of men.

The Old Testament principle still governs the New Testament church: “What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.” (Deut. 12:32). The Lord’s Supper is not ours to edit. Christ Himself, the Host and Head of the table, appointed one cup to be blessed, shared, and received by faith. To keep that form is not traditionalism, it is obedience.

In the simplicity of that single cup lies the testimony of unity: one blood, one salvation, one body, one Lord. It preaches to our eyes, nose, and lips the same gospel that the Word preaches to our ears, that all who drink by faith are joined to Him and to one another. That is why the church must hold fast the pattern given, guarding the form of sound words and the form of sound signs.

One in Christ

The common cup also symbolizes the unity that all believers share in Christ. Paul teaches in 1 Corinthians 12:12: “For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.” Likewise, Galatians 3:28 declares, “…for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”

The shared cup proclaims this unity. Its meaning is diminished when replaced by individual cups, which emphasize the individual over the body. By its very symbolism, it shifts the focus from communion to independence, a spirit more akin to Baptist individualism than to Reformed catholicity. The Apostle writes again in 1 Corinthians 10:16, “The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?” The term communion (Greek koinōnia) means joint fellowship or shared participation.

Thus, the common cup visibly testifies to our oneness in Christ and the wholeness of His body.

The Common Cup in History

Scripture warns, “Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set” (Proverbs 22:28). Our fathers have spoken clearly on this matter.

If we are the generation that removes their landmarks, we risk leading our children into greater departures. History tells us that it is the natural progression of each generation to take a step to the left of their parents. The first generation that takes liberty often gives birth to one that takes license. We must therefore tread carefully, lest we be remembered as those who uprooted the ancient boundary of the common cup.

The Heidelberg Catechism, Lord’s Day 28, Question 75, reads:

Q. 75. How art thou admonished and assured in the Lord’s Supper, that thou art a partaker of that one sacrifice of Christ, accomplished on the cross, and of all his benefits?
A. Thus: That Christ has commanded me and all believers to eat of this broken bread, and to drink of this cup, in remembrance of Him, adding these promises: first, that His body was offered and broken on the cross for me, and His blood shed for me, as certainly as I see with my eyes the bread of the Lord broken for me, and the cup communicated to me… (Heidelberg Catechism, Lord’s Day 28, Q&A 75, The Three Forms of Unity, 1563).

The Catechism assumes one cup, the cup, shared among communicants. Its very language reflects the practice of the Reformed churches of the sixteenth century.

Zacharias Ursinus, the principal author and commentator on the Catechism, explains:

“The rites which Christ has instituted are, that the Lord’s bread be broken, distributed, and received, and the Lord’s cup be given to all the communicants, in remembrance of His death.”
(Ursinus, Zacharias. Of the Lord’s Supper, and the True Doctrine and Pure Administration Thereof; With a Refutation of Both Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation. Translated by G.W. Williard, Columbus, Ohio: Scott & Bascom, 1852, p. 376.)

Our Form for the Administration of the Lord’s Supper further confirms this:

“The cup of blessing which we bless is the communion of the blood of Christ.”

Note the singular form: the cup. Only one container is blessed. To alter this to these cups would not only distort the biblical form (1 Corinthians 10:16), but also force the minister to bless dozens of separate vessels, a practice alien to Reformed liturgy and foreign to the institution of Christ. In congregations where wine is pre-poured before the service by the deacons or custodians, those cups are not blessed at all, since only the one vessels lifted and consecrated in prayer receives the blessing. To avoid this inconsistency, one would need to invent new liturgical formulas, precisely the kind of “man-made inventions” our Reformed fathers rejected.

Finally, our Church Order, Article 62, provides:

“Every Church shall administer the Lord’s Supper in such a manner as it shall judge most conducive to edification; provided, however, that the outward ceremonies as prescribed in God’s Word be not changed, and all superstition be avoided.” (Church Order of the Reformed Churches, Article 62.)

If, as we have shown, the use of a single vessels accords with Scripture and the testimony of our fathers, then fidelity to both the Word of God and our Church Order compels us to retain it. To multiply the cups is not a mere matter of convenience; it alters the symbolism established by Christ Himself.

The common cup, then, remains a confession, not only of our communion with the Savior, but of our communion with one another in His body.

The Dutch Reformed Fathers

In 1618–1619, the Synod of Dordrecht, one of the greatest assemblies of the Reformed Church, commissioned a group of ministers to compose an extensive commentary on the whole of Scripture. These Annotations upon the Holy Bible (published in 1637) became a monumental achievement of the Dutch Reformation, combining careful exegesis with profound pastoral theology. On Matthew 26:27, these annotations record:

“And took the cup, and having given thanks, gave (it) to them; and they all drank of the same [cup]: [Namely, as Christ had commanded them, Matthew. 26.27].” (The Dutch Annotations upon the Whole Bible, Dordrecht, 1637, on Matthew 26:27.)

Here, the phrase “they all drank of the same” leaves no room for ambiguity. The fathers of Dort understood that Christ gave one cup to His disciples, not many. The unity of the act, its shared participation,was as essential to its meaning as the wine itself.

Among those who continued and deepened the theology of Dordt was Wilhelmus à Brakel (1635–1711), one of the most beloved Dutch divines of the Nadere Reformatie (Dutch Second Reformation). Writing in his Redelijke Godsdienst (The Christian’s Reasonable Service), à Brakel captures both the theological and experiential beauty of the common cup:

“Even if the world, as their enemy, hates, despises, persecutes, and oppresses them, there is yet no reason for concern; they can readily miss its love, for they have better company and they refresh themselves in a sweet manner in the exercise of mutual love. They confess this unity in the Lord’s Supper by eating of the same bread and by drinking of the same cup. ‘For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread’ (1 Cor. 10:17).”
(à Brakel, Wilhelmus. The Christian’s Reasonable Service. Translated by Bartel Elshout, Morgan, PA: Soli Deo Gloria, 1992–1995, vol. 2, p. 577.)

For à Brakel, the act of sharing one cup is a confession of love within the communion of saints. The Supper is not a private experience of piety but a visible expression of corporate grace. To separate believers into individuals at that table, is to obscure that shared participation of one body and one blood.

Another eminent theologian of that era, Herman Witsius (1636–1708), author of The Economy of the Covenants Between God and Man, expressed the same conviction. He observes the careful language of Scripture itself:

“The third action of the guests is, to drink the consecrated wine out of the cup. It is remarkable, that our Lord said concerning the cup, not only ‘Take this, and divide it among yourselves,’ Luke 22:17, but likewise added a mark of universality, ‘Drink ye all of it,’ Matt. 26:27. And we are told how they complied with this command, Mark 14:24, ‘And they all drank of it.’”
(Witsius, Herman. The Economy of the Covenants Between God and Man. Phillipsburg, PA: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1990 [1693], vol. 2, pp. 455–456.)

Witsius’ emphasis lies not only on the drinking but on the universality—drink ye all of it. His observation that “they all drank of it” underscores the singularity of the vessel, the same cup that Christ Himself blessed. The grammar of the Gospel record itself bears witness to a shared participation, not a divided one. The act of dividing the wine into many cups reverses the very picture Christ painted: one Savior, one covenant, one communion.

It would be easy to multiply testimonies. The history of the Reformed Church, indeed, of the one holy catholic and apostolic Church, presents a continuous witness to the practice of the common cup. From the Early Church Fathers (Justin Martyr, Cyprian, Augustine) through the Magisterial Reformers (Luther, Calvin, Bucer), and into the Puritans, Dutch Second Reformation, and Westminster Divines, the unity of the cup remained unbroken. Only in recent times has this “ancient landmark” been displaced by convenience, custom, and fundamentalist Baptist influences.

To abandon the common vessel is to obscure a symbol Christ Himself established and our fathers faithfully preserved. The danger is not only historical amnesia, but theological erosion. For when the visible unity of the body is fractured in sign, it is soon forgotten in substance.

“Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set” (Proverbs 22:28). To hold the cup together is to hold the faith together.

Objections Answered

It cannot be denied that the introduction of individual cups arose for two main reasons. The first is theological: the spirit of individualism that marks our age, the “me-centered” religion of private faith and personal preference. The second is practical: the concern for sanitation and public health (Note: This was originally written in Alberta in 2009, pre-pandemic. It has undergone 2 revisions).

The first objection, rooted in the modern preference of self, has already been answered. In the Lord’s Supper, unity must always take precedence over individuality. The Table of Christ is both a mirror for self-reflection and a communion in one body and one blood.

The second objection, sanitation, deserves careful and sympathetic attention.

“The Yuck Factor”

Many sincere Christians hesitate to use the common cup because of what might be called “the yuck factor.” The thought of drinking from the same vessel as others, they fear, poses a heightened risk of contagion. This objection is not new; it is simply modernized with medical vocabulary. Yet, the question must be asked: does a perceived health concern nullify the divine command?

We believe not. The following considerations show why.

1. Two Thousand Years of Safe Use
   The common cup has been used since the night of the first Supper. Across centuries, cultures, and continents, believers have shared it without record of epidemic or plague caused by the sacrament. Are the dangers of disease more pressing today than in the days of Christ, when sanitation was far less advanced? Surely not. The Lord instituted the cup in full knowledge of human frailty and still commanded its use. To alter His command under the pretense of greater wisdom is to claim we know better than He.

2. Other Points of Contact Are Far Less Sanitary
   Every worship service involves far greater exposure to germs than the Lord’s Table. The handshake at the door, the pew, The Psalter, the doorknob, or the bathroom sink, all are touched by many hands. Even the trays and the bread, handled repeatedly, carry greater potential for transmission than the silver rim of a single cup. If fear of illness is the measure, one ought to avoid the entire gathering rather than the blessed vessel of communion.

3. The Nature of the Elements Themselves
   Communion wine, often fortified to twelve percent or higher, has antibacterial properties that inhibit the spread of disease. Furthermore, noble metals, particularly silver, possess natural antimicrobial qualities recognized even in modern science. The cup of blessing is not only symbolically sanctified but physically resistant to contamination.

4. Historical Testimony
   Countless ministers over the centuries have borne witness that no communicant under their care was ever made ill by the common cup. Such testimony, repeated through generations, is no small matter. The absence of harm across two millennia speaks with quiet trust to the providence of God in the preservation of His ordinance.

For these reasons, the fear of illness cannot overrule the command or the symbolism of the common cup. To invoke the “yuck factor” as grounds for changing Christ’s institution is to forget that the Supper is a holy ordinance, not a matter of convenience or hygiene. It is worth recalling the Lord’s rebuke to Peter when he resisted what seemed unclean: “And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common” (Acts 10:15).

Are we wiser than our fathers? Are we wiser than God?

The Pragmatic Objection

Another objection arises from practicality. Some ask, “If one cup is commanded, why do some congregations use two?”

Here, Article 62 of the Church Order provides helpful guidance:

“Every Church shall administer the Lord’s Supper in such a manner as it shall judge most conducive to edification; provided, however, that the outward ceremonies as prescribed in God’s Word be not changed, and all superstition be avoided…” (Church Order of the Reformed Churches, Art. 62).

When larger congregations use two cups, one for each side of the table, it maintains the symbol with accommodation of space and time. The emphasis remains the same: one shared content among many participents, signifying one body and one faith. The duplication of the vessel for practical necessity does not fracture the unity it represents.

What does destroy the symbol is the distribution of a tray of individual cups to each communicant. This practice removes the visible expression of shared participation and replaces it with the symbol of personal identity. The result is not a table of fellowship but a row of private devotees.

The difference, then, lies not in number but in nature. Two cups at one table still proclaim one communion as they are poured from a common vessel. One hundred individual cups proclaim none.

In light of Scripture, the testimony of our fathers, and the unbroken witness of Church history, the objections raised against the common cup argue too little, and concede too much.

The “cup of blessing which we bless” (1 Corinthians 10:16) remains both the sign and seal of our unity in Christ. To divide the cup is to divide the sign; and to divide the sign is to blur the truth it was meant to proclaim.

A Plea to Return to the Common Cup

Unless the Lord Himself sends a reformation upon His Church, each generation will drift further from the previous. History bears solemn witness to this truth. The natural man does not move toward obedience, but away from it. Compromise begins as convenience and ends as corruption. What one generation tolerates, the next will embrace.

Some shrug it off as an unimportant matter, hardly worth defending. Yet if it truly were of no consequence, why alter it? Why introduce division into the Church of Christ over something so insignificant? The very act of change betrays that it does, in fact, matters. If it were a light thing, the old path would have been left untouched.

We readily confess that salvation does not hinge upon the number of cups used at the Table. Yet obedience does. The question is of faithfulness. What has the Lord commanded, and what has His Church received from the beginning? To tamper with Christ’s ordinances under the guise of progress is not reform, but decline.

The Holy Supper is a holy mystery, a means of grace to all who partake in faith. There, the believer communes with the crucified and risen Christ, feeding on Him by faith, tasting His promise in the bread and cup. Should we not, then, seek to walk in tender obedience to His revealed will, even in the smallest detail of His institution?

There is no Scriptural warrant for individual cups, none. There is, however, abundant testimony in Scripture, in the Confessions, and in Church history for the common cup. To alter what Christ Himself blessed and gave to His disciples is to let the hand of modernity touch the holy.

Let the Church maintain. Let her lay aside the inventions of convenience and retain the sign of unity given by her Lord. For as the Apostle says, “The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16).

Works Cited

• The Holy Bible: King James Version. Cambridge University Press, 1769.

• The Heidelberg Catechism. 1563. In The Three Forms of Unity. Grand Rapids: Reformation Heritage Books, 2011.

• The Dutch Annotations upon the Whole Bible. Dordrecht: Synod of Dort, 1637.

• à Brakel, Wilhelmus. The Christian’s Reasonable Service. Translated by Bartel Elshout, Morgan, PA: Soli Deo Gloria, 1992–1995.

• Ursinus, Zacharias. Of the Lord’s Supper, and the True Doctrine and Pure Administration Thereof; With a Refutation of Both Transubstantiation and Consubstantiation. Translated by G. W. Williard, Scott & Bascom, 1852.

• Witsius, Herman. The Economy of the Covenants Between God and Man. Phillipsburg, PA: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Company, 1990.

• Church Order of the Reformed Churches. Grand Rapids: Free Reformed Publications, 2018.

• Lewis, Jerrold. The Common Cup: A Command. Revised ed., 2009.

Appendix: A Pastoral Provision

Dec, 2025

During the height of the COVID pandemic, New Jersey became one of the nation’s epicenters of sickness and death. Our consistory felt the weight of two duties that seemed to press against each other. On the one hand, we were unwilling to suspend the administration of the Lord’s Supper, “This do in remembrance of Me” (Luke 22:19), (1 Corinthians 11:26). On the other hand, we could not lightly dismiss potential transmission, nor ignore the fear of the weaker brother, whom Scripture commands us to bear with tender regard (Romans 14:1; 1 Thessalonians 5:14).

In searching for a faithful path forward, we were guided by Scripture and by the Church Order that governs us. The original Church Order of Dort (1619), Article 62, gives helpful guidance:

“The Lord’s Supper shall be administered only where there is supervision of elders in an orderly manner according to the ecclesiastical form. And in such a manner as the consistory shall judge most conducive to edification.”

Further, it adds clarity to the boundaries:

“...provided, however, that the outward ceremonies as prescribed in God’s Word be not changed and all superstition be avoided.”

Together, these affirm two truths:

1. The manner of administration is entrusted to the prudence and judgment of the consistory.

2. The elements themselves may not be altered.

With these boundaries in place, the path became clear. Here I will describe our first pandemic communion. Around the Communion table, we placed simple Passover Seder or Kiddush cups (Brooklyn), uniform, unadorned, reverent.

At the center of the table stood a single common vessel, the wine consecrated with thanksgiving, following the apostolic pattern: “The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16).

The act of blessing rested upon the singular vessel (wine carafe), filled with the one element, representing the one blood of the one Savior. From this vessel I walked around the table, pouring a small measure into each communicant’s cup. In doing so, the congregation retained both sides of the biblical pattern: the singularity of the consecrated cup (Matthew 26:27–28), and the distributive command, “Drink ye all of it.”

At the close of each sitting, the communicants placed their cup into a cloth-covered basket at either end of the table.

While the present members rose from the table, and returned to their pews, the deacons quietly replenished each seat with a fresh cup for the second table sitting. It was smooth and unassuming as a visual. Both tables drank from the same consecrated wine, thus maintaining the unity of the element while making provision for the weaker brother (Romans 15:1–2).

We believe this arrangement preserved the integrity of the sacrament. It allowed us to maintain the elemental pattern revealed in Scripture (one bread and one wine blessed and given to the many, 1 Corinthians 10:17), while exercising the pastoral discretion entrusted to the consistory. It also honored the heart of the apostolic command: edification (1 Corinthians 14:26), unity (Ephesians 4:3), and love (John 13:34–35).

To this point we have kept this practice in place since 2020. We have had several wonderful Lord’s Suppers together with no complaint, signaling that this provision satisfies the hearts of all our communicants which, like every congregation, has a variety of opinion. It enabled us to continue in obedience without burdening consciences, without altering the elements, and without losing the signified communion of saints.

If you want to see how this is done, visit this link. The table first appears at the 1 hour and 33-minute mark.

At first, we manage our guilt like a balance sheet. We compare, excuse, minimize, ignore, add, subtract, multiply, until the scales balance. But when the Spirit draws near, our arithmetic fails. The smallest sin outweighs the world. What was once a notion becomes a thick, pressing, personal presence. This is the Spirit at work in the soul.

It’s here we see how sin is not so much something done, as something born. It lives in us. Its roots twist through the will, the memory, the imagination. It does not let go easily.

And so, the believer cries from personal tasting: “Too heavy for me!” This sounds like despair, but its actually the cry of honesty. Because only as the sinner cries does the Savior stoop.

Grace does not erase the weight, it bears it away in your stead. At the cross, the crushing burden was transferred. The soul that falls down there is lightened. The conscience, once bent, straightens beneath Christ’s substitution, remittance, and forgiveness.

Sin is heavy, yes. But it was never meant to be carried by two. There is no double jeopardy in the Father’s justice.

When the Word convicts you, let it press, but pass it on to Calvary. Let it drive you down only far enough to reach Christ’s washing hands.

For there, the burden freshly rolls away,
and the ground feels strangely soft beneath your feet.

Subscribe now

A man may live a long time without knowing his own face. From that mirror, he looks at others sitting behind him, beside him, all around him, but never at himself. He forms many conclusions without understanding, renders many secret judgments without all the facts, but never looks quite long enough, deep enough at himself, to see what heaven sees. Then comes the hour when the Word lays hold of him! It’s no longer a book, but a living eye, and he cannot turn away.

“But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein” James says. That looking has nothing natural about it. It is supernatural. The Spirit holds the mirror steady, and now three images stare back: the old man, proud and scarred, the new man, faintly glowing beneath. Or is it the other way around?

The heart winces because now the Word is not read, it reads. Every verse another revelation of self. Every commandment another beam of light upon the dusty feet.

Bu there is a third image. The washing Healer. In that reflection, beside the sinner’s, stands Christ. His face marred more than any man’s. The image of the invisible God made sin for us, and I now stand clean.

When I linger here in the Word, at my exposed self, I see a changed and changing self, invited to remain until His likeness traces itself all over mine.

So I ask myself in this week of preparation:
When I read, do I look and go my way?
Or do I wait long enough for His gaze to meet mine?

Because this mirror, unlike all others, shows what I am.
But it also shows what I am becoming in Christ.

The believer knows that nothing hides a secret better than his own heart. Perhaps we know more about our family and friends than we do ourselves, because we passively study them. We’re often a complete mystery to ourselves. I’m not surprised to learn “that the heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked, who can know it?” (Jer. 17:9,10). Our heart keeps secrets that self can’t see. It

sounds strange, but that’s the power of self deception.

But when something approaching a true sight of self appears,

the ice of pride begins to shock, then thaw,

and like waking from a sleep,

we see what was once always there but hidden,

manifested to us by the light of God’s Spirit by His Word. It’s not a mystery why the old man hates to read it.

Believe me, there is no surprise like the surprise of self.

It’s the Spirit’s good pleasure to reveal me to me, then Christ to me. Or is it the other way around? Either way, where the book of my heart, locked up and double-guarded by pride, is read aloud by the Spirit in His Word. His sanctifying work is a painful work. Justification removes guilt. Sanctification removes corruption. It is a light that pans the walls of my dark room. When He shines upon me through the means of grace, the features of my portrait become visible.

In that light,

I see some beauty, some ugliness.

Some joy, some pain.

Some spotlessness, some filth.

It’s a painfully pleasant process, this self-discovery. Because when the Spirit shines in our hearts, we can see ourselves more clearly than before, and apply to sovereign grace anew. Cleans me, wash me. I cry for the thousandth time, “God be merciful to me a sinner.” And He hears me. I am restored to the Father’s unceasing love.

So then, the secrets of the heart are not made manifest to the Spirit, but by the Spirit... to me. Paul says, “For I know nothing by myself” (1 Cor. 6).

I say, amen, Paul, amen.

Subscribe now

There is a line spoken in Scripture that only grace can hear. It was not written for angels, nor offered to the righteous. It was spoken over a people who had wandered far, to hearts faint with shame and years of forgetfulness. It is a Voice that finds the sinner in exile and comforts him: “I have loved thee with an everlasting love.”

Everything about us changes. Our hearts grow cold, our words falter, our strength runs dry. Yet here is a love that was never kindled; it has always been. Before time began, when the world was still an unspoken thought, that love already was. It did not begin when you first believed, and it will not end when you fail. This love has no sunrise or sunset, no winter or spring. It is as eternal as God is eternal.

“I have loved thee.” Not, I will love thee if thou art faithful. Not, I once loved thee but now am weary of thee. The verb is complete. It stretches backward into eternity and forward into glory. It means that nothing has taken God by surprise, not your sin, not your weakness, not your wandering. His love has seen it all and still says, I have loved thee.

And because it is everlasting, it is drawing. “Therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee.” The cords that pull a soul to Christ are ribbons of mercy. The sinner who feels the weight of guilt and yet senses a strange desire to pray again, to come home, to believe, he is already being drawn by that everlasting love.

Do you see what this means? God’s love is immovable. It is not dependent on the temperature of your heart, but on the constancy of His. Even in your most barren season, when you feel furthest from grace, the everlasting arms are beneath you.

This is the love that called Abraham out of Ur, that found Jacob at Peniel, that carried Israel through the wilderness, that came down in Christ to wash the feet of sinners. It is the same love that speaks today.

No matter how far you have gone, you have not outlived His affection. The One who spoke through Jeremiah still speaks through His Son. His love has no beginning, and it will have no end. You were loved before you fell, and you will be loved beyond your rising.

That is the everlasting love of Christ.

Subscribe now

In the ancient Near East, a walled garden was a symbol of wealth and love, an oasis amid wilderness, accessible only to its keeper. Water was precious, life was guarded. To say “a garden enclosed” was to speak of delight that is protected, not diminished. It was the image of fruitful intimacy, rather than reclusion.

Western identity is more shaped by public life and self-expression, pictures of your meal, your devotional environment, favorite texts, and tends to question anything hidden.

But in Scripture, the hidden is holy. The ark was veiled (Exodus 40:21). The manna was kept in a golden pot (Hebrews 9:4). The Most Holy Place was curtained off (Exodus 26:33). Christ Himself often withdrew to solitary places (Luke 5:16), not because He lacked communion, but because He possessed it.

“A garden enclosed is my sister” (Song of Solomon 4:12).

When the Song calls the Bride “a garden enclosed,” it is highlighting this paradox: the soul is most open to God when it is most shut out to the world. Holy intimacy is secrecy turned heavenward, where the walls are not prison but covenant.

Every regenerate soul becomes a garden of God. He is the Master who tends it. What He plants, He guards. What He waters, He hides. The fence around this garden is not so much to keep joy in, but to keep corruption out. Where every act of grace creates an enclosure.

God does not save men into public squares of constant exposure, but into inward gardens, where He and the soul may speak together without witness.

On the other hand, the unregenerate heart is like an open field. Everything grows there. Weeds, thorns, and a few wildflowers of human goodness and virtue. It has no gate, no Master, no seal. But the heart made new by Christ becomes enclosed by His Spirit. The hedge of His providence rises, the wall of His Word encircles, and inside, quietly, the air begins to change. What was once barren begins to bear the scent of Eden.

“A garden enclosed is my sister, my spouse; a spring shut up” (Song of Solomon 4:12).

Inside this garden lies a spring shut up. Grace is not a picture. It has motion. The Spirit within the believer is a flowing life, never still, yet shut up. Not in the sense of suppression, but more like a sacred reserve. It is “shut up.” The stream is guarded from contamination. The world cannot drink from it; even self cannot fully sound its depth. It rises from beneath, from the hidden places where the Spirit Himself has entered the soul. Outward trials only make it clearer, inward trials only mineralize its worth, and pressure breaks the ground and reveals what runs beneath.

Then the image deepens: a fountain sealed. “A garden enclosed is my sister, my spouse; a spring shut up, a fountain sealed.”

In Scripture, the seal means three things: ownership, authenticity, and protection. Jacob rolled the seal off Laban’s well for Rachel in Genesis 29. It bore Laban’s signet. It belonged to him. The soul sealed by God bears Christ’s signet. She belongs to her Bridegroom. Her fountain is no longer for others. Her inward life is authenticated by His Spirit witnessing with hers that she is His (Romans 8:16).

And the seal protects: the enemy cannot unstop what Christ has closed, nor corrupt what grace keeps pure.

This is why sanctification feels both open and closed. There is a holy loneliness to the Christian life. The believer walks among men but lives with God. He converses, works, laughs, lives, yet something of him is elsewhere, hidden. The sealed fountain runs beneath all visible acts. No eye sees it but the Bridegroom’s. The soul has learned that love cannot be divided.

Here lies the supernatural wonder: union with Christ does not dissolve individuality; rather it completes it. The enclosed garden is a new creation, Eden in miniature. Every virtue, every holy affection, every tear shed for sin is one more blossom in that inner Eden. Its seasons may change, yet the fountain never runs dry.

And when the Beloved comes, “Let my beloved come into his garden, and eat his pleasant fruits” (Song of Solomon 4:16), He come as Possessor. The garden was His all along. What the soul calls “mine” was always “Thine.” He walks within, as once in the cool of the day (Genesis 3:8), and finds what His own Spirit has grown: love, joy, peace, longsuffering, fruit not native to this soil.

To dwell here is to discover that holiness is intimacy; not public virtue, but private delight. The spring shut up becomes, in the end, a river of life flowing out toward eternity, but it must first run deep in secret before it can run broad in glory.

Subscribe now

One of the great dangers warned against in Scripture is legalism. Where pride makes the Word of God a mirror for others instead of ourselves. Jesus’ harshest words were reserved for the Pharisees, scribes, and experts in the law who trusted in their own righteousness and despised others. “This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips,” He said, “but their heart is far from me” (Matthew 15:8).

Paul echoes the same sentiment in Galatians, where he warns that to add anything to Christ is to lose Him entirely. “Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?” (Galatians 3:3). Legalism is not law-keeping; it is law-trusting. It is trying to stand before God in my own moral clothing, rather than in Christ’s imputed robe.

The Marks of a Legalist

First, the legalist, thinking himself better than others, and condemns rather than liberates. Luke writes that the scribes and Pharisees “watched him” (Luke 6:7). When we are not self-suspicions, we become suspicions of others. The legalist watches others. Suspicion becomes habit. Their eyes are trained to spot specks in others while excusing beams in themselves. They use truth as a sword rather than a light.

Second, a legalist values rules over all else, because rules are easier to follow than investing in love. When Jesus healed on the Sabbath, they did not rejoice at the healing, they condemned the timing. Their obedience was loveless. The Word Himself stood before them, but they only saw infraction, not incarnation.

Third, deep down, the legalist is insecure. They can’t see it, but its true. Pride and fear alternate like tides in him. He must condemn others to quiet the cold gnaw of his own heart. His conscience becomes a courtroom, the judge, jury, and prosecutor all in one.

The Universal Infection

The ugly truth is, we are all born pharisees. It is in our spiritual DNA. Adam hid behind his leaves, Israel behind his golden calves, the Pharisee behind his moral résumé. “I thank Thee that I am not like this man!” Too bad. The other man was a broken man. A chest beating man. A crying man, “God be merciful to me a sinner.” Jesus tells us which one went home justified (Luke 18:14).

The danger of legalism is that it feels so right. It creates a buffer between my sin and God because it gives me something to measure by, someone to outdo, something to cling to when my conscience condemns me. We do it without notice. But grace cannot live long in the same house with pride. Either Christ bears your burden, or you do.

The Cross: Legalism’s End

So what is the cure? A lighter lifestyle and looser rules? No. A deeper sight of the Redeemer will cure us. The cure for a pharisaical heart is to commune the with the One who has already met the Law’s every demand. On the cross, Christ took the curse of failed legalists, Pharisees, self-righteous preachers, elders, every kind of proud heart, and bore it away. “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us” (Galatians 3:13).

And when a man sees that, truly sees it, something dies in him, and something new is born. Patience, love, tenderness toward others, in both word and thought. The condemning heart becomes a humbled heart. The rule-keeper becomes the grace-beggar. The critic becomes a worshiper in spirit, and in truth.

Lord, Deliver me from the religion of myself.
Teach me to lay down the scale and take up the cross.
Make me, a Pharisee, rejoice in mercy,
and becoming a beggar of grace.

Subscribe now